Re: special Echelon's tool of industrial Spam

[ZoeScanner <zoescanner@yahoo.com>]

[: hacktivism :]

Did I get this by mistake? or is this how the lists
are done? I am a new subscriber,so...if this is the
way it is done,please ignore this mail.If I get no
response I will know this is ok. Thankyou
Zoe  
 
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 19:42:27 +1000 
From: pho <photon@2600.org.au>  | Block address 
To: hacktivism@tao.ca 
Subject: Re: special Echelon's tool of industrial Spam

Reply-to: hacktivism@tao.ca 
        Add Addresses  
 


[: hacktivism :]

> - false headings PGP to slow down the decoding of
the malls by Level;
> - automatic generation of malls; (I had announced
yesterday the use of the cgi
> http://www.echelon.wiretapped.net/echelon.cgi)but it
seems that the version on
> line improved this point... The use of the cgi was
undoubtedly useful for the
> tests.

i heard an announcement for this on
packetstorm.securify.com the other day
(it's searchable, methinks) .. the gist of it seemed
to be that it would shove 
out randomly spoofed packets with echelon-jamming
content -- so that nobody 
had to put up with reading it.  it took the content
from echelon.wiretapped.net
although it seems that the release that you're talking
about has had this 
CGI's functionality built in.

ps: imho, none of the stuff that's been done will
really be effective.  media
    whorage is usually good, though.

- pho

[: hacktivism :]
[: for unsubscribe instructions or list info consult
the list FAQ :]
[: http://hacktivism.tao.ca/ :]


       



=====

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

[: hacktivism :]
[: for unsubscribe instructions or list info consult the list FAQ :]
[: http://hacktivism.tao.ca/ :]