Re: security

[rdom <rdom@thing.net>]

[: hacktivism :]

transparency at all levels displaces the rhetoric of security, cybercrime,
and cyberterrorism that the new infowar_economies need to
flow on....they need secrets in to order_to_function, they need
encryption in order to command and control, they to
break_the_law in order to enforce_the_law.

The Guarded Sociey is bound by the narratives of covert realities.

hacktivism should counter the narratives
of security_states and stay hyper_transparent.

"like ghosts......."
--the zapatistas

SHAWN GALVIN wrote:

> [: hacktivism :]
>
> I have been on this list since it started to increase in volume of mail.
> I have watched the list take on more and more new members.  It has been
> very enlightening to read the regular postings, but wake up everybody!!!
> SECURITY!!  It is of very high probability that there are some pigs that
> are sitting in some office somewhere who are watching this list.  When
> the list was younger it seemed like less of a concern, but now it sounds
> as if you guys are going to plan an action over the fucking internet.
> Have you any common sense?  You'll have trouble planning anything over
> any media when your ass is in the can.
>                         security.
>
> [: hacktivism :]
> [: for unsubscribe instructions or list info consult the list FAQ :]
> [: http://hacktivism.tao.ca/ :]


[: hacktivism :]
[: for unsubscribe instructions or list info consult the list FAQ :]
[: http://hacktivism.tao.ca/ :]