Re: security

["Bulot" <bulot@x-arn.org>]

[: hacktivism :]



Each time press relate the attack of any system it's give  more reasons for
people to feel insecure and it's a good bargain for people who wants make
money with this fear. I think it's more a free advertising for a product or
a trademark or  a good reason for a state to product repressive laws.
I think the stake it's not in the form but in the content. The stake is
more in qualities and competences of anybody to put into shared space
instead against organizations.

Bulot

----- Message d'origine -----
De : rdom <rdom@thing.net>
À : <hacktivism@tao.ca>
Envoyé : samedi 25 septembre 1999 04:39
Objet : Re: security


> [: hacktivism :]
>
> transparency at all levels displaces the rhetoric of security, cybercrime,
> and cyberterrorism that the new infowar_economies need to
> flow on....they need secrets in to order_to_function, they need
> encryption in order to command and control, they to
> break_the_law in order to enforce_the_law.
>
> The Guarded Sociey is bound by the narratives of covert realities.
>
> hacktivism should counter the narratives
> of security_states and stay hyper_transparent.
>
> "like ghosts......."
> --the zapatistas
>



[: hacktivism :]
[: for unsubscribe instructions or list info consult the list FAQ :]
[: http://hacktivism.tao.ca/ :]