FYI: one hackers FBI file
From
Paul Kneisel <tallpaul@nyct.net>
Date
Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:06:52 -0500
[: hacktivism :]
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 13:37:46 -0500
From: William Allen Simpson <wsimpson@greendragon.com>
To: raven@ietf.org
Cc: ietf-ppp@merit.edu, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: [Raven] FBI secret police
[snip for clarity-DBM]
Wonder of wonders, I just received a portion of my FBI Freedom of
Information records yesterday. Apparently, their very existance was
classified "SECRET", by "G-3", and was supposed to be "declassified on:
OADR". Any idea what that means?
However, most of the contents were still classified secret again by
60267NLS/BCE/JMS for reason 1.5(C), on May 25, 1999, to be declassified
on "X.1". So, virtually the entire documents are blacked out, labeled
"b1". The included handy reference guide lists "(b)(1)" as:
"(A) specifically authorized under criteria established by an
Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense
or foreign policy and (B) are in fact properly classified pursuant
to such Executive order"
These records are from 1991, 1992, and 1993. The "predication for this
investigation" is secret. The "Basis of the Investigation" is secret.
The "Objectives of the Investigation" are secret. The "Status of the
Investigation" is secret.
Other smaller sections are blacked out with labels (b)(2):
"related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of
the agency"
and (b)(7)(D):
"could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a
confidential source, including a State, local, or foreign agent or
authority or any private institution which furnished information on
a confidential basis, and, in the case of records or information
compiled by a criminal law enforcement agency in the course of a
criminal investigation, or by an agency conducting a lawful national
security intelligence investigation, information furnished by
confidential source"
It is particularly amusing that the latter is used to black out
records of contact with my own parents (who refused to talk with them),
copies of email that I sent, and my vehicle title (where I have the
original copy). Somebody had a very heavy hand in the censorship.
(Also amusing, the FBI was still using all cap teletype in '92 :-)
What is less amusing is that the FBI spent over a year going to each
place that I had email access and tried to convince them to revoke
my access. They were successful in (at least) two places.
They interviewed at least 11 people out of their Albuquerque, Boston,
Detroit, Minneapolis and San Francisco offices.
Apparently, they investigated my IETF activities at Santa Fe, San Diego,
Boston and Washington DC. They quote the Santa Fe and San Diego
proceedings. They direct agents to IETF meetings, "to ascertain if
subject came to any notice at the PPPWG meetings." They make specific
reference to CHAP and DES.
Various clear sentence fragments indicate a concern that the PPPWG
meeting was taking place sponsored by Los Alamos, and that "these
meetings attract interested persons worldwide." Another fragment
indicates a concern that my PPP software was distributed by servers
at White Sands Missile Base and mirrored at various universities.
The most legible interview, still mostly blacked out, gives a hint as
to the questions that were being raised:
<black>
"<black> stated that he believes the PPP is legal technology. However,
if the government is attempting to restrict the dissemination of
authentication protocols, he believes it is too late. It is like
locking the barn after the horse has escaped (per <black>).
<black>
"In summary, <black> does not believe Simpson has engaged in breaking
United States export laws regarding the export of cryptographic
devices or is interested in violating such laws at the behest of a
foreign power."
The name blacked out appears to occupy 3 letters. My thanks to Karl Fox
or Craig Fox!
The instigator of the investigation appears to have a surname of 4 or
maybe 5 letters. Thus, it is probably not "Atkinson". Perhaps it's
the former IAB member that required the removal of the PPP LCP
encryption option, refused to publish CHAP, and refused to grant the
IPSec charter.... When the NomCom replaced the IAB, he was first
against the wall.
"Sources whose identities are concealed herein have furnished
reliable information in the past except when otherwise noted."
Gentlefolk, we have a stool pigeon in the roost, whose interests are
contrary to the interests of the IETF and the Internet as a whole. It
is a male. And he is regularly reporting IETF member activities for
secret investigation. Beware.
WSimpson@UMich.edu
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
[: hacktivism :]
[: for unsubscribe instructions or list info consult the list FAQ :]
[: http://hacktivism.tao.ca/ :]