Re: MASSIVE DISINFO CAMPAIGN UNDERWAY RE: JAM ECHELON DAY
From
ricardo dominguez <rdom@thing.net>
Date
Thu, 07 Oct 1999 14:26:14 -0400
Organization
The Thing
References
<Version.32.19991007105447.00ff8840@pophost.wired.com>
[: hacktivism :]
hola all,
I agree no black helicopters at wired (we at EDT have
most of them here with us--thanks NSA for the support!)
and thanks James for letting us know what happened.
So, indeed, let's all have a happy Jam Echelon Day.
ciao,
ricardo
p.s. Any misinformation is good misinformation (Nixon, 1972)
James Glave wrote:
> [: hacktivism :]
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Everyone,
>
> This is getting out of hand. Needlessly. My name is James Glave, and I am
> the reporter who wrote the article. I have signed this email with a PGP key.
>
> There is no conspiracy. I heard about Jam Echelon Day and I collected some
> opitnions about it fora short news story. Along the way, I bungled up the
> reporting -- including getting the date wrong -- and then corrected the
> story. I disclosed the correction in a note on the bottom of the story.
> It's still there. Please read it:
>
> http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/22102.html
>
> There is no black helicopter parked on the roof at Wired News. I hope this
> is puts the matter to rest, and wish everyone a happy Jam Echelon Day.
>
> James Glave
> Wired News
>
> >Wow. I just got an email from a guy (using a hotmail account with the
> >name "Robert Kemp") claiming to have originated the date of the Echelon day
> >and claiming not to know how to get ahold of me (BUT HE SENT ME AN EMAIL).
> >
> >Also, the article on Wired has *moved* (it isn't the lead story now)
> >*AND* it says the "jam echelon date" is *21* October instead of October 18.
> >
> >There is also now a *correction* stating that the "jam echelon day" was
> >started by the Activism List and that AJF didn't set the "jam echelon date"
> >and that "Wired regrets the error," however, I *repeatedly,* and in writing
> >had told the writer, James Glave, that I had never heard of a "jam echelon
> >day" and we had *nothing* to do with setting "Oct. 18" (or any other date).
> >I have all those emails.
> >
> >The writer of the article wrote to me, out of the blue. The whole
> >things appears to have been a set up -- a propaganda piece to associate the
> >"jam echelon" effort with "militia" to discredit it (and me) and of course,
> >acting like Echelon "hasn't been proved to exist" which is, of course, utter
> >bullshit.
>
> James Glave, News Editor, Wired News http://www.wired.com +1 (415) 276-8430
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPfreeware 6.0 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
>
> iQA/AwUBN/zgwloRpMqSYpx5EQIl1QCgsdtyLXEYpaoLEFdfr3CrvjeX0SsAn1+T
> hDts/mQ81TwUAMbZagHLmse+
> =RyX/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> [: hacktivism :]
> [: for unsubscribe instructions or list info consult the list FAQ :]
> [: http://hacktivism.tao.ca/ :]
[: hacktivism :]
[: for unsubscribe instructions or list info consult the list FAQ :]
[: http://hacktivism.tao.ca/ :]