Re: full translation of ma bin et al letter; wang hui report

From "Dale Wen" <>
Date Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:23:25 -0500
Dkim-signature a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BM0sE+v2wGZW7419fZATe7Zgjlhqqs9Oi2Qsj5Jpw0RY1KKZ1etqwhiB5Mk5kF7QcodZf87TEqGO19qcKD1VHh1OxdIKtmV7jzbNyY95F19gb4SjK8By+bghilwIZx6Hm+Yst4P9p06i9bwjYoEbDpk2ave/MAByZXBgLDh/ia4=
Domainkey-signature a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eH1qqz5X+Jcp+tRTUYBoOcLO9hFEscrNn5jK33dF/cx2jLXiv5/920YkrCQuMNYHGU8SbKJ6Z4XLUAsDI06ol/L1QL96coexG1XG0w1/VdnEVLnJOCFcG0NCRL4OlWw6GzDw1o8uo6F7ZO5ISPaLkk33U3nzDVEzYdv0VKU43go=
In-reply-to <>
References <>

chinaelections is not blocked. I checked and searched their Chinese
site, and could not find Ma Bin letter. I am wondering if that is the

Also, most articles on the Chinese site are quite mainstream/right
wing, like this one
So I am really wondering: are they really pushing the Ma Bin letter? why?

On 8/6/07, <> wrote:
> Thanks, Matt,
> For this link and your persistence in getting these materials to us.  So is
> chinaelections, which is a Carter Center spinoff, and which lists a Beijing
> address, being blocked?  They are certainly pushing the Ma Bin letter.  If
> they are not being blocked, why?  And could we link to them for the letter,
> saying that it can be found there, but without posting the text ourselves,
> as Frank suggested?  Would that make any difference?
> Bob
> ________________________________
> Get a sneak peek of the all-new

Dale Wen, Ph.D.
Consultant on China issues

I recently published a report about China and globalization
A shorter English version
A longer Chinese version