What is a New "Socialist" Village?

From Brian Turner <myrd62@yahoo.com>
Date Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:55:40 -0800 (PST)
Domainkey-signature a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=eGqHJKFr+pHiWCPDBko5dDkBY2/tIIG0sv0HYWoZvhFQ2snem3rkV1LQNugyRoYyv0CuN/XFw4EnN2ne2UbzRTtM33z3cG2zxsUaaTJatYVm8a9EGjef1NiOZdx4LN7xd+XO9gKuGux9yOspEjmoueNbtUiCAnoMV+wmM+Wr8/E= ;
In-reply-to <BAY109-F4032D6A4D264FD2BF77833A9D20@phx.gbl>


What I'd like to know is exactly what Hu/Wen et al
have in mind when they talk about New "Socialist"
Villages?  As Chomsky once put it, that word has
become so "evacuated of meaning" & "debased" in 20th
century discourse that before proceding one has to
unravel exactly what the person means.

I've been in Vietnam for 2+ years, and have heard two
different conceptions of "socialism" (1) one-party
politics [i.e. the economic system is totally
irrelevant; e.g. calls for journalistic relaxation
bring forth defenses of "socialism"].  (2) a system
for paying employees where everyone is a lazy bum and
sits around offices doing nothing while collecting a
fixed unbreakable paycheck.  

The idea of worker councils or co-ops is so far off
the radar it invariably solicits blank stares of
incomprehension.  

On someone's Amazon review (an English teacher in
China) they said they asked a student what "socialism"
was, and the student answered "love the country".  

So what does the leadership mean in China now when
using this word?

--- Matt Hale <husunzi@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the link, Hairong.
> 
> Does anyone know any details about the Party's new
> "Shehuizhuyi Xin Nongcun 
> Jianshe (Socialist New Village Construction)"...[deleted]

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com