THE NSA SHOW
From
ricardo dominguez <rdom@thing.net>
Date
Wed, 15 Sep 1999 14:52:03 -0400
Organization
The Thing
[: hacktivism :]
THE NSA SHOW
The Revenge
of Crystal City
by The Electronic Disturbance
Theater - 09/15/1999
[columns]
While the rest of the net.art.activism
gang was partying in Linz, Austria at
this year's Ars Electronica Festival,
two members of the Electronic
Disturbance Theater hunkered down just
a mile and half from the core of the
Pentagon to interact with .mil, .gov,
and .com entities.
On September 8, Ricardo Dominguez and
Stefan Wray delivered a multimedia
presentation complete with spoken word,
video, and sound to an audience of
stern yet curious bureaucrats and
hyperparanoics at InfoWar Con '99, a
conference in sterile Crystal City
dedicated to Internet system security
and organized by none other than the
guru of infowar.com, Winn Schwartau.
A blend of pure chronology and analysis
of EDT's own antics set off against a
series of interruptions and collages of
Zapatista video mixed with fast
forwarded hacker shorts held a captive
audience for over one and a half hours.
The conference was strewn with top
military brass, corporate leaders, And
top level law enforcement officials who
were bent on framing the debate about
security in the direction of
cyber-terrorism, equating digital
bodies with real bodies.
If there was a common ground - maybe a
long shot - it was probably in The area
of simulation. While not on the agenda
in an overt way, the entire notion of a
war on the Internet is predicated on
some sort of believe in the fake and
the virtual, simulated warfare in the
digital realm.
It is difficult to say how we were
reviewed. But minimally it seems clear
that we did grab people's attention,
evidenced by few people leaving the
presentation once they were riveted in
their seats. Winn Schartau later said
he was waiting for the "results" to
come in, meaning he wanted to see how
people reacted to our "theater."
Most definitely it was worth the
journey to Washington, a rare shot at
seeing how the other side thinks. Maybe
some heads were turned. One young man
in uniform who said he worked for the
Defense Information Systems Agency made
a point of telling us that the military
was not a monolithic block but rather
was a vast enterprise full of multiple
and diverging views. He, at least, was
interested in what we had to say.
An outcome of the talk was an
invitation by an editor at Covert
Action Quarterly for us to co-author a
piece for their special millennium
issue. Plus we got a chance to chat
with a few more journalists and make
connections with other marginal figures
who appeared in the cracks between the
.mil and .gov entities.
Being at a conference of hyperparanoics
hell-bent on demonizing the work Of
many of our cohorts and comrades is not
the way we'd like to spend all Our
time, but for a brief glimpse at their
mindset and worldview it was certainly
well worth it.
P.S. We spoke to 4 War College
students, one who had studied EDT in
school, individually between
presentations. They all wanted to know
who was in control of EDT, how were our
actions and tactics decided, and what
were are plans in the future?
Of course this means that they failed
to grasp that within soft_power cells
each individual has to the ability to
move quickly and represent the whole,
without having the whole cell involved
directly with each gesture. Also, the
importance of keeping each cell as
small as possible in order to allow the
sub_divisions of knowledge to
hyper_flow via improvisations and
invention. As with any good
improvisation in the theater-if the
scene is playing well no one actor is
in control and no one actor can decide
the outcome of the scene. Each cell
member is also open to a number of
different flows beyond the cell that
push the scene beyond the constraints
of the individuals cell members
singular trajectories. The scene_itself
controls the ground of the actions,
tactics, and future actions. A scene
which is itself is part of a specific
historicity of call and response
networks that have converged within and
around the zapatista communities in
resistance.
These War College students also when
questioned about what they have been
reading-had little to no knowledge of
the history of performance theory,
aesthetics, critical theory, or current
network theory. Of course one could
say-why should they!-but not even to
have read current military discourse on
chaos and simulation seems to show that
indeed they are already losing future
wars now.
http://www.thing.net/~rdom/ecd/ecd.html
[: hacktivism :]
[: for unsubscribe instructions or list info consult the list FAQ :]
[: http://hacktivism.tao.ca/ :]