Re: the Cybersquatting bill

["Me Uh, K." <pram512@yahoo.com>]

[: hacktivism :]

Wait, so I don't follow.

Does that mean that any household name (ie. Clinton,
Pitt, Dole, Eastwood, ect.) is (effectively)
immediately trademarked (for the purpose of domain
name registration)?  

So in order to sue the bastard who got miak.com, all I
really have to do is get famous?

Am I off the mark here, or is that essentially what
you said, Tom?

-mia k. (trying to think of a way to get famous by
tuesday)

--- Tom <trgarner@yta.attmil.ne.jp> wrote:
> [: hacktivism :]
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Another point everyone misses on this is, not just
> corporations but
> Hollywoodland (oops) people, their NAMES would also
> fall under this
> attempt.
> 
> Just another thought, b/c after all, WHO put
> Clinton, but w/ major push
> >from Hollywood... :)
> 
> > 
> > 2. U.S. Congress Tries to Squash Cybersquatters
> 
> ----
> Tom Garner
> email:  trgarner@yta.attmil.ne.jp,
> tom.garner@yokota.af.mil, trgarner@hotmail.com
> ICQ:  4580576
> 
> 
> [: hacktivism :]
> [: for unsubscribe instructions or list info consult
> the list FAQ :]
> [: http://hacktivism.tao.ca/ :]
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com


[: hacktivism :]
[: for unsubscribe instructions or list info consult the list FAQ :]
[: http://hacktivism.tao.ca/ :]