Re: echelon keyword inadequacies
From
Peter <peter@hereintown.net>
Date
Mon, 11 Oct 1999 17:43:09 +0000
References
<38020FF9.BB78840D@thing.net>
[: hacktivism :]
you are right, and you are not right. We here in the USA and Europe should
take care at the first of the UKUSA part of E. People in Asia can take care
of the Asia/Pacific part of E.
To have success with this action you should hold it as much simple as
possible. What you describe is a bit compilcated and many people will
say:"Oh, i'm not doing it, that is too complicated."
Another fact is that still 98% of all americans don'yt know about E. We
also should think about this......
Peter
rdom@thing.net wrote:
> [: hacktivism :]
>
> Subject:
> <nettime> echelon keyword inadequacies
> Date:
> Mon, 11 Oct 1999 23:39:39 +1000
> From:
> "scotartt" <scot@systemx.autonomous.org>
> To:
> "nettime-l" <nettime-l@bbs.thing.net>
>
> while I wholeheartedly agree with the aim of jam echelon day; i must
> query
> the use of the keywords, in a single block, as below, as a method for
> achieving this.
>
> firstly to 'jam echelon' you should at least pay attention to the fact
> that UKUSA has five member nations; only one is interested particularly
> in
> right-wing patriot terrorists and branch dravidians. this keyword
> selection is simply a valorisation of a certain brand of politics as
> being
[: hacktivism :]
[: for unsubscribe instructions or list info consult the list FAQ :]
[: http://hacktivism.tao.ca/ :]