Hacktivsim - A New Hope?
From
ricardo dominguez <rdom@thing.net>
Date
Sat, 19 Aug 2000 07:44:36 -0400
[: hacktivism :]
Hacktivsim - A New Hope?
Presented at Hackers2000, NYC
by Dan Orr - 08/16/2000
[thing reviews]
http://bbs.thing.net
Same Old Story
History is full of examples where a group with specialized knowledge was
feared and reviled by a public who simply did not understand them. During
the Renaissance, alchemists early experiments with chemistry were viewed
as heresy or the scams of unscrupulous con artists. Many were accused as
witches in colonial America they espoused controversial political views
such as equality between the sexes, the separation of church and state, or
religious toleration. Others were branded because of their knowledge of
folk remedies or the medicinal properties of herbs. Arthur C. Clarke's
often cited "third law" states that: "Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic," and in the 21st century, computer hackers
have joined the ranks of alchemists and witches as a stigmatized group.
A recent poll by the San Jose Mercury news, taken during a recent wave of
denial of service attacks against prominent websites, suggests fear of
hackers is based on a lack of knowledge about the online world. Fearful
non-Internet users outnumbered fearful Internet users by nearly two to one.
Despite several prominent hoaxes, such as reports that hackers seized control
of a British media satellite and endangered the lives of NASA astronauts,
the media has found little motivation to correct public misconceptions about
hackers. Broadcasts and newspapers are rife with stories such as: "A Cyber
Pearl Harbor? Next Devastating Sneak Attack May Come from Hackers Not
Warplanes" and "Hacker Steals 300,000 Credit Card Files from CD Universe." In
an era of shrinking audiences and an increasing media outlets, fear grabs
readers and tunes in viewers. DouglasThomas, a professor of Journalism at
the University of Southern California notes: "Most stories about hackers are
rife with hyperbole and, more often than not, omissions of context or fact
that would give a more balanced and less alarmist perspective." Nor is
Thomas alone in his assessment. Online Journalism Review columnist Matt Welch
has suggested hysteria over hackers demonstrates a significant decline in
journalistic standards, and "show the decisive new role being played by
people who would have never been called 'journalists' three years ago." Other
reporters have offered even harsher critiques of their colleagues. In a
1997 analysis of Internet media coverage, Wired columnist Brooke Shelby
Biggs observed: "There are quite literally so many arrogant idiots
covering the Internet for traditional media that if I wrote about them and
them alone, I could fill up my 1,000-word space daily by citing their
inaccuracies, misleading statements, and fear-driven bias and paranoia one
by one." If someone claimed they had hacked the sky and could make it fall
the press would report it. The truth is there are about as many computer
hackers engaged in cybercrime as there are witches who worship Satan.
[MORE]
http://bbs.thing.net
{A Scene from Electronic Disturbance Theater's soon to be staged work
*Hacktivism: network_art_activism - A Play in 11 Acts* from Autonomedia Press}
http://www.thing.net/~rdom/ecd/ecd.html
[: hacktivism :]
[: for unsubscribe instructions or list info consult the list FAQ :]
[: http://hacktivism.tao.ca/ :]