re: Autodesk cowed by threat of attack by RTMark (and workgroup@rtmark.com)
From
King Wilson <kingwil@enteract.com>
Date
Thu, 10 Feb 2000 19:22:07 -0600
[: hacktivism :]
>[: hacktivism :]
>
>
>So now RTMark turns to using the same tactics eToys and this AutoDesk
>company use; bullying. We will bully a small company into doing what WE
>want or else do what we did to eToys (which was really NOTHING - proven by
>the stocks preformance and other companies in the same business stocks).
Bronc, please don't take this the wrong way, but you are SO full of shit.
What would have been an acceptable response to Autodesk's (or eToys)
demands? Sit back and take it?
I think I'm gonna start a career as a professional writer, and I'm
gonna go by the name of Bronc Buster. How would you feel about that?
What if I just came up to you on the street, and told you to find a
new name? and what if I brought a cop along with me, to smack you in
the head every time you wrote an e-mail, as a reminder? Would you
just accept it?
Would you feel bad as an "activist" if you took the offense, as a defense?
RTMark did not go up to AutoDesk, unprovoked, and threaten them.
They merely warned AutoDesk what the consequences would be, if
AutoDesk decided to throw a punch. Why this upsets you, I have no
idea.
If the eToys debacle proved nothing, then why did AutoDesk
seemingly back down in the face of RTMark?
You seem to want to keep the unwashed masses away from the bathtub
when you should be giving them guns and a map. This all reminds me,
for some reason, about something A. Whitney Brown wrote in a book a
few years back. He was writing about the Southern Baptists, I
believe. "They decide to live their lives in pious misery, with the
hopes of getting into heaven when they die. This is like keeping
your eyes shut through a movie, with the hopes of getting your money
back when it's over"
read icculus
[: hacktivism :]
[: for unsubscribe instructions or list info consult the list FAQ :]
[: http://hacktivism.tao.ca/ :]